Characterizations of the exponential functionIn mathematics, the exponential function can be characterized in many ways. The following three characterizations (definitions) are most common. This article discusses why each characterization makes sense, and why the characterizations are independent of and equivalent to each other. As a special case of these considerations, we will see that the three most common definitions given for the mathematical constant e are also equivalent to each other.
CharacterizationsThe three most common definitions of the exponential function exp(x) = ex are the following.
Why each characterization makes senseEach characterization requires some justification to show that it makes sense. For instance, when the value of the function is defined by a sequence or series, the convergence of this sequence or series needs to be established. Characterization 1It can be shown that the sequence is an increasing sequence which is bounded above. Since every bounded, increasing sequence of real numbers converges to a unique real number, this characterization makes sense. Characterization 2To show the infinite series converges at x = 1, it is enough to compare with a geometric series. To show that the series converges for all x, we use the ratio test, which shows that the series has an infinite radius of convergence, since Characterization 3In this case, we define the natural logarithm function ln(x) first, and then define exp(x) as the inverse of the natural logarithm. In other words, for all y > 0, define Since 1/t is continuous for all t > 0, this function makes sense, and since 1/t is positive for all t > 0, this function is strictly increasing (hence, injective) for y > 0. (Note that if y < 1, then ln(y) is a negative number.) By the integral test and the divergence of the harmonic series, it follows that ln(y) → ∞ as y → ∞. By a similar argument, a change of variables (t Equivalence of the characterizationsThe following proof demonstrates the equivalence of the three characterizations given for e above. The proof consists of two parts. First, the equivalence of characterizations 1 and 2 is established, and then the equivalence of characterizations 1 and 3 is established. Equivalence of characterizations 1 and 2The following argument is adapted from a proof in Rudin, theorem 3.31, p. 63-65. The irrational of e follows quickly from this proof, see theorem 3.32. Let x be a fixed real number. Define By the binomial theorem, so that where ex is in the sense of definition 2. Here, we must use limsup's, because we don't yet know that tn actually converges. Now, for the other direction, note that by the above expression of tn, if 2 ≤ m ≤ n, we have Fix m, and let n approach infinity. We get (again, we must use liminf's because we don't yet know that tn converges). Now, take the above inequality, let m approach infinity, and put it together with the other inequality. This becomes so that Equivalence of characterizations 1 and 3Here, we define the natural logarithm function in terms of a definite integral as above. By the fundamental theorem of calculus, Now, let x be any fixed real number, and let We will show that ln(y) = x, which implies that y = ex, where ex is in the sense of definition 3. Here, we have used the continuity of ln(y), which follows from the continuity of 1/t. References
Categories: Mathematical analysis |
|
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia article. Browse Wikipedia for more information. |